From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 04:10:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686C137B405; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 04:10:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from heechee.tobez.org (heechee.tobez.org [213.237.10.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6540343FB1; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 04:10:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tobez@tobez.org) Received: by heechee.tobez.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D8C4F175D1; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 14:10:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 14:10:28 +0200 From: Anton Berezin To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030401121028.GA78452@heechee.tobez.org> Mail-Followup-To: Anton Berezin , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ijliao@FreeBSD.org References: <20030331210904.GA37851@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030331210904.GA37851@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i cc: ijliao@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: math/p5-Math-Trig port -- unnecessary? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 12:10:32 -0000 On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:09:04PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Dear porters, > > I noticed the presence of the math/p5-Math-Trig port containing > version 0.02 of the module, dating back to 1997. This was committed > to cvs about two months ago, which strikes me as kind of odd, as > Math::Trig is a standard module which has been bundled with the > default perl install for all perl5 releases since at least > perl-5.005_03. It's up to version 1.01 by now. Compare: > > http://search.cpan.org/author/JARW/Math-Trig-0.02/Trig.pm > > http://search.cpan.org/author/JHI/perl-5.8.0/lib/Math/Trig.pm > > Seems a bit superfluous to me. Is there some specific reason for > having this port? I don't see one. The combination of Math::Trig and Math::Complex has more functionality than this one even in 5.005_03. I think this port should be retired. Cheers, \Anton. -- It's a short step from "rigor" to "rigor mortis". -- Chip Salzenberg