From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Mar 19 7:40: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE43C37B7B0 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 07:40:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id HAA38212; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 07:40:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 07:40:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200003191540.HAA38212@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" Subject: Re: ports/16546: mail/imap-utils: a new port Reply-To: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/16546; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/16546: mail/imap-utils: a new port Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 00:31:13 +0900 Hi. As the originator of this PR, I'd like it to be closed. I've been thinking that we should push the authors until they get imap-utils much refined to merge into imap-uw. I mean I find it (so far) so rough that I don't dare guarantee its quality nor its security, etc. :-( -- / /__ __ / ) ) ) ) / Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( "If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message