From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Nov  3 17:15:25 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA20327
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 3 Nov 1997 17:15:25 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA20314
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 3 Nov 1997 17:15:21 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from brian@awfulhak.org)
Received: from gate.lan.awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA06717;
	Mon, 3 Nov 1997 21:26:00 GMT
Message-Id: <199711032126.VAA06717@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: tarkhil@mgt.msk.ru
cc: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Win 95 PPP faster than pppd? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 03 Nov 1997 09:39:40 +0300."
             <199711030639.JAA19068@asteroid.mgt.msk.ru> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 1997 21:26:00 +0000
From: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > I recently did some quick tests on pppd under -current & 2.2.2.  In 
> > comparison, the older 2.2.2 pppd *sucks*.
> > 
> > pppd 2.3.1 from -current either matched or out-performed user-ppp, 
> > and both trod all over pppd from 2.2.2.
> Don't you know, can I merge pppd 2.3.1 with -stable?

It may not be that easy.  There are kernel mods that need to be done. 
You could examine the commit logs to see what peter needed to do to 
upgrade -current....

Your best bet may be to ask Peter if he plans to merge it back into 
2.2, but I suspect the answer will be no.

Try ppp :-)

> Alex

-- 
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org>, <brian@FreeBSD.org>, <bri@OpenBSD.org>
      <http://www.Awfulhak.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....