From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 29 18:22:47 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098E310656B1
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:22:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from deeptech71@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com
	[209.85.218.213])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821768FC14
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:22:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from deeptech71@gmail.com)
Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so1326932bwz.43
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
	:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=URl135aMvQi1eiOoo5yziCru/oRtbDGmZssZwOLHvy8=;
	b=almhM9Pr+uf5phHLc7nRTDAnUDyVdrBr+rCeX60yoSepIUYT0tjZNN06fK6UfpAdsw
	riLLKx9Erq5gULdUHSU0stlOEdNq1wgIZime8wOvuKl2bO66wJjgV8aKhRz2woOt+XeB
	hsdy+8MTNKxauaBrtHnzVoiM00tMP6iA3pGag=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=Yhq9vXDI5BCWL3ETFVLU9tSZoexT03BmsWDUd4l/G2lLJaWD5NVxhkL2Z5xTzbitcx
	kVEzz53YNv/l0fNRpKic4kVZwRL+QD05pkGuesibfnMlEWmrgRXZfdXX48vgXNM56XrP
	nrkAHT8SHACXFCS7PdctL+yOlmyaUiG3Xp5lg=
Received: by 10.103.117.9 with SMTP id u9mr415480mum.55.1241029365368;
	Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?157.181.96.136? (quark.teteny.elte.hu [157.181.96.136])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j2sm3283395mue.41.2009.04.29.11.22.44
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <49F89B6E.7030303@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:24:46 +0200
From: deeptech71@gmail.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
References: <49F4070C.2000108@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <49F4070C.2000108@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: C99: Suggestions for style(9)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:22:47 -0000

Christoph Mallon wrote:
>> -When declaring variables in functions declare them sorted by size,
>> -then in alphabetical order; multiple ones per line are okay.
>> +When declaring variables in functions declare them sorted in 
>> alphabetical order;

What's wrong with logical grouping, especially when the new localized 
declaration style is used (so tons of variables are not declared at a 
time anymore)?