From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 19:46:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4246D1065676 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 19:46:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from april.london.02.net (april.london.02.net [87.194.255.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A588FC20 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 19:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muji2.config (87.194.237.233) by april.london.02.net (8.5.140) id 4F4C2FDD004772E0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 19:46:08 +0000 Message-ID: <4F551800.4080904@onetel.com> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:46:08 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100924 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F547C59.1040604@bananmonarki.se> <4F548571.1050203@gmail.com> <4F54ED12.1090409@bananmonarki.se> <4F54EF7A.2030109@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4F54EF7A.2030109@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: port to package amd64 to i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:46:11 -0000 On 05/03/2012 16:53, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 05/03/2012 16:42, Bernt Hansson wrote: >> >> Thank you for the pointer. I do find it a bit overkill to setup jails >> and such, just to build a few ports. I was thinking more along the line of; >> >> cd /usr/ports/"random port" >> >> make "it for i386 even if we are building it on amd64, ooh by the way >> build it as a package, and all dependencies as packages as well" > > About the only way to cross-build ports is to set up a 32-bit jail on a > 64-bit host. I believe that is do-able, but I could be delusional. Could you do it in a tinderbox? This thread http://www.marcuscom.com/pipermail/tinderbox-list/2011-June/002177.html discusses it a bit with a possible solution. Things have probably moved on since then which may or may not help. Chris