From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 18 07:45:19 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC338106564A
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:45:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [77.221.156.50])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8853A8FC6C
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:45:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from desktop.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (85-142-52-164.well-com.net
	[85.142.52.164]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
	by ftp.translate.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B753013DF46;
	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:45:18 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:45:15 +0400
From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <254357380.20090818114515@serebryakov.spb.ru>
To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <16362.1250581262@critter.freebsd.dk>
References: Your message of "Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:38:33 +0400."
	<852978746.20090818113833@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<16362.1250581262@critter.freebsd.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Subject: Re[2]: Difference between FreeBSD-7 and FreeBSD-8 in tasting?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:45:19 -0000

Hello, Poul-Henning.
You wrote 18 =E0=E2=E3=F3=F1=F2=E0 2009 =E3., 11:41:02:

>>  I've found problem. geom_raid5 check cp->provider->sectorsize before
>>g_access() call, and on boot it is zero before g_access() and 512
>>(which is proper value) after this call.

> This is a bug in geom_raid5:
> The sectorsize and mediasize are only valid if you hold a proper access
> to the provider.
  Yep, I understand this. It worked on 7 and worked after proper boot,
(when somebody tasted this providers -- disks --  already), so bug was
well-hidden.

--=20
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>