From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Aug 10 13:27: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail-in-01.piro.net (mail-out-02.piro.net [194.64.31.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC68F37BC7B for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:27:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marc.vanwoerkom@science-factory.com) Received: from nil.science-factory.com (ScienceFactory-atm1-153.piro.net [195.135.137.205]) by mail-in-01.piro.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/PN-991208) with ESMTP id WAA00438; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 22:26:59 +0200 Received: by nil.science-factory.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id 369131EF4; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 22:25:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Marc van Woerkom To: bartol@salk.edu Cc: joeo@cracktown.com, questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Tom Bartol on Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:24:50 -0700 (PDT)) Subject: Re: XFree86-4.0.1 and DRI References: Message-Id: <20000810202515.369131EF4@nil.science-factory.com> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 22:25:15 +0200 (CEST) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I've just tried to enable DRI on a G400 but it's still a no go. It's a > 32MB G400 and I'm trying to run at 16bpp 1280x1024. I get the following > error message in the XFree86.0.log file (see attached for more detail): What worked well was XF 3.3.x series with Utah-glx. Look for it in the ports collection. The situation for XF 4.x is not known to me regarding that card. I am not up date (but catch up :)a Keep in mind that Utah glx is for XF 3.3.x and that you can't hang such a glx module into XF 4.x. XF 4.x uses a SGI implementation and a newer version of the glx protocol. Again, I don't know if someone took the old Utah GLX driver yet and whacked it for XF 4.x series. Regards, Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message