Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 23:34:43 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ghost of __sF and COMPAT4X libraries. Message-ID: <20021103073443.GA3511@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20021103072528.GA17924@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20021103055916.GA31853@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20021103070518.GA3375@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> <20021103072528.GA17924@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 11:25:29PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 11:05:18PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 09:59:16PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > > The following libraries are installed by COMPAT4X, but are not > > > present in 4.7. I assume these are carried forward from 4.x x < 7. > > > > > > libssl.so.1 libusb.so.0 libcrypto.so.1 libfetch.so.2 > > > > Grrrr... This means we had version bumps on -stable without > > providing compat4x libraries on 4.x - I think we're seriously > > fscking up here :-( > > libssl and libcrypto were bumped in -stable (about a year ago), and > the old versions were added to COMPAT4x on -stable (and -current). > There is no problem here; I don't know about the others. Pheeuw... That's at least something. From my point of view version bumps on a release branch are a big no-no; no matter if you have a compat-self package. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021103073443.GA3511>