From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 9 19: 5:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mostgraveconcern.com (mostgraveconcern.com [216.82.145.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D42337B5CA for ; Tue, 9 May 2000 19:05:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@mostgraveconcern.com) Received: from danco (danco.mostgraveconcern.com [10.0.0.2]) by mostgraveconcern.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA00593; Tue, 9 May 2000 19:05:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@mostgraveconcern.com) Message-ID: <01e001bfba24$419d9aa0$0200000a@danco> Reply-To: "Dan O'Connor" From: "Dan O'Connor" To: "Sheldon Hearn" Cc: "freebsd-stable" Subject: Re: Kernel build number in 4.0-STABLE Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 18:57:29 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="x-user-defined" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> What is the proper method for building a 4.0-STABLE kernel? > >Any way that works. Since both methods achieve the same goal, either >one is okay. >You can't do this in STABLE yet, but patches are available for CURRENT. >We're just waiting for feedback from pc98 and alpha users before >committing the code. I imagine that this will be available in STABLE in >a month or so. Ok. Thanks for the heads up. >For now, this is just another one of those go-nowhere threads that >everyone who likes to see his name in print will get involved in. :-) Kinda like the Oscar ceremony! :-) --Dan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message