From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Apr  3 13:32:27 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from qatar.net.qa (qatar.net.qa [194.133.33.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3AF14DBD
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Apr 1999 13:32:14 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sodah@qatar.net.qa)
Received: from qatar.net.qa ([194.133.37.239])
	by qatar.net.qa (8.8.8/Internet-Qatar) with ESMTP id AAA25513;
	Sun, 4 Apr 1999 00:28:53 +0300 (GMT)
Message-ID: <3706880C.9296CE1C@qatar.net.qa>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 00:28:44 +0300
From: Fadi Sodah <sodah@qatar.net.qa>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kevin Weiss <kevin.weiss@mail.utexas.edu>,
	freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: afterstep vs. windowmaker...which one is better?
References: <19990403211841.DDB1B14F5A@hub.freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Kevin Weiss wrote:
> 
> If anyone has an opinion on which one s better

WindowMaker is fine. I believe it's easier to 
configure than AfterStep.

-Pons

Powered by FreeBSD


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message