From owner-freebsd-standards Thu Feb 27 21: 6:32 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CB237B401; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 21:06:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228BB43F3F; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 21:06:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from gamplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA08382; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:06:28 +1100 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:08:00 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: Mike Barcroft Cc: Tony Finch , Subject: Re: default gcc conformance mode In-Reply-To: <20030227122421.C93968@espresso.bsdmike.org> Message-ID: <20030228160410.M21151-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Mike Barcroft wrote: > Tony Finch writes: > > Should the default conformance mode of gcc be C99+extensions rather > > than C89+extensions? This would make the -pedantic option more useful. > > I think some would argue against it, since we don't have a complete > C99 library yet. Yes. We also don't have a complete C99 compiler. At least the floating point arithmetic on i386's is non-conforming. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message