From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 12 14:59:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E3D16A400 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fooler@skyinet.net) Received: from smtp2.skyinet.net (smtp2.skyinet.net [202.78.97.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA83143D49 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:59:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fooler@skyinet.net) Received: from fooler (fooler.ilo.skyinet.net [202.78.118.66]) by smtp2.skyinet.net (Postfix) with SMTP id CB2595BA50; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:59:51 +0800 (PHT) Message-ID: <0f0e01c65e41$c127bd10$42764eca@ilo.skyinet.net> From: "fooler" To: "Brian Candler" References: <443BDE05.8040204@elischer.org> <0cba01c65de0$f656f7f0$42764eca@ilo.skyinet.net> <20060412123254.GB81569@uk.tiscali.com> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:59:52 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Julian Elischer , "M. Parsons" Subject: Re: PPPoE question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:59:55 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Candler" To: "fooler" Cc: "Julian Elischer" ; "M. Parsons" ; Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 8:32 PM Subject: Re: PPPoE question. > On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 11:27:00AM +0800, fooler wrote: >> >what the heck is synchronous pppoe? we connect to pppoe via ethernet so >> >it is already synchronous (?) >> >> set speed sync > > And how does that change the pppoe ethernet frames? nothing change and still the same... ethernet frames are at layer 2 while synchronization (either asynchronous or synchronous) is at layer 1... synchronous is much better than asynchronous for ethernet links... fooler.