From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 20 06:58:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D48616A4CE for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 06:58:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from winston.piwebs.com (217-19-20-186.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.20.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2499F43D2F for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 06:58:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avleeuwen@piwebs.com) Received: (qmail 7286 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2004 14:58:00 -0000 Received: from vincent.piwebs.com (192.168.0.95) by winston.piwebs.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2004 14:58:00 -0000 From: Arjan van Leeuwen To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:58:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <20040318023045.GE3018@dragon.nuxi.com> <4059CCB0.1050901@bis.midco.net> In-Reply-To: <4059CCB0.1050901@bis.midco.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_gwFXACTwibuqW5D"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200403201558.41172.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> cc: Peter Schultz Subject: Re: [PATCH] for SCHED_ULE & libpthread issue (was Re: I like SCHED_4BSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: avleeuwen@piwebs.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 14:58:04 -0000 --Boundary-02=_gwFXACTwibuqW5D Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 18 March 2004 17:22, Peter Schultz wrote: > David O'Brien wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:23:47AM +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote: > >>Until the problem is fully addressed, I will propose following patch > >>to be applied. (the least intrusive one attached in the former message) > > > > Do people think we should commit this? > > I don't recall seeing any reports from people running UP, but it seems > to do the trick for us SMP folks. Has anyone heard from Jeff lately? I > suppose he's got something major in the works, but this patch seems > fairly benign. I'm also running it on my UP machine now, and although I had no complaints= =20 previously, this does seem to improve interactivity in KDE when compiling=20 some heavy ports in the background. Arjan > > Jeff is a nice guy, I don't think he will lash out at anyone for trying > to help out. Although, the way people have been acting the last week or > so, I'm not certain. ;) > > Pete... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --Boundary-02=_gwFXACTwibuqW5D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAXFwg3Ym57eNCXiERAhotAKCPMXxAyVahuVt3ms73P/xhFGquaACgrBja 8lX+jfiNsx3B+Zr7jk0VmGQ= =1AGS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_gwFXACTwibuqW5D--