From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jan 9 20: 2:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.infowest.com (ns1.infowest.com [204.17.177.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216DC37B41A for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:02:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from Presarionb (unknown [208.187.27.252]) by ns1.infowest.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AFB421A91; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:02:31 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 21:01:57 -0700 To: Kristofer Pettijohn , questions@freebsd.org From: Lorin Lund Subject: Re: Spamming FreeBSD lists. Organization: W.B. Software Inc. X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <20020110040231.6AFB421A91@ns1.infowest.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I can imagine why people might not subscribe. This is high volume mailing list! I find it takes up a noticeble part of my day even though I delete some entries without even reading the subject. (I admit I have a hard time not at least reading the subject.) This is the number 1 place to get help but it can be overwhelming to subscribe. The subscribe and unsubscribe processes can take a while so subscribing for a short time just to ask a single question can be a time consuming task too. 1/7/2002 11:39:00 AM, Kristofer Pettijohn wrote: >> It seems to me that this might be one extra hoop for nonsubscribers, but >> nothing too incomprehensible or onerous, and it would profoundly reduce the >> amount of spam. >> Good idea? Bad idea? > >Or even disallow non-subscribers from posting at all? >If they want to post bad enough, they should be part of the list :) > > >-K. > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message