Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 20:44:22 +1300 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> Cc: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: too much confusion over kernel building Message-ID: <200101180744.UAA14563@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20010118094123.B6927@rapier.smartspace.co.za> References: <20010118022343.A7286@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com>; from dmaddox@sc.rr.com on Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 02:23:43AM -0500
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 Jan 2001, at 9:41, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > Who exactly is advocating a full buildworld? The "new" style should not > require a full buildworld. If it doesn't work, it's a bug. The handbook does. Well, it doesn't, but the frequently interpretion is just that. And my patch aims to fix that common misinterpretation. Amongst other things. -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ FreshPorts - http://freshports.org/ NZ Broadband - http://unixathome.org/broadband/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101180744.UAA14563>