Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PATCH: AGAIN, Add creation time to dynamic firewall rules Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0412290829280.9444@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKGENMALAB.davids@webmaster.com> References: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKGENMALAB.davids@webmaster.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, David Schwartz wrote:
>
> I submitted this email and patch about a month ago. I received a few "this
> is a good idea" type replies. I'd like to see it committed to current.
....
> > --- ip_fw.h 1.89.2.2 2004/10/03 17:04:40
> > +++ ip_fw.h Fri Nov 26 18:51:15 2004
> > @@ -353,6 +353,7 @@ struct _ipfw_dyn_rule {
> > u_int64_t bcnt; /* byte match counter */
> > struct ipfw_flow_id id; /* (masked) flow id */
> > u_int32_t expire; /* expire time */
> > + u_int32_t created; /* creation time */
> > u_int32_t bucket; /* which bucket in hash table */
> > u_int32_t state; /* state of this rule (typically a
*hmm* on sparc times are already 64bit. Does that matter?
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.53.0412290829280.9444>