From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 20:01:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7888216A4CE for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 20:01:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4910043D3F for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 20:01:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dsyphers@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) ESMTP id iB2K1klX025702 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:01:46 -0800 Received: from yggdrasil.seektruth.org (c-67-171-38-33.client.comcast.net [67.171.38.33]) (authenticated bits=0)iB2K1kSp013610 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:01:46 -0800 From: David Syphers To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:01:50 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200412021201.50234.dsyphers@u.washington.edu> Subject: portupgrade, packages, and same versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 20:01:47 -0000 I just upgraded to 5-STABLE from an older version of 5, and wanted to rebuild all my ports because of the ABI compatability breakage just before 5-RELEASE. I ran across behavior in portupgrade that I don't understand - if I force an upgrade because I already have the same version installed, portupgrade refuses to use packages. e.g. ---> Found a package of 'net/cvsup-without-gui': cvsup-without-gui-16.1h.tbz (cvsup-without-gui-16.1h) ---> Located a package version 16.1h (cvsup-without-gui-16.1h.tbz) ** Ignoring the package, which is the same version as is installed (16.1h) ** No package available: net/cvsup-without-gui What on earth is wrong with portupgrade, and is there any way of convincing it to use packages in this case? If I run 'portupgrade -rafP' it will merrily upgrade via ports when forcing an upgrade, so why not packages? Thanks, -David -- "To get out of the Metaphysical Void, you either have to grasp the meaning of the universe or roll doubles twice." -Cecil Adams