Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 09:55:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Hooman Fazaeli <hoomanfazaeli@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206230949490.31186@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <4FE57481.90601@gmail.com> References: <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211350250.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4FE32C16.3050205@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211622570.3092@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4FE57481.90601@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I meant, is it now possible to have >2TB FS with UFS? UFS2 is here since IMHO year 2005. Now the only problem is fsck time. actually IMHO fsck can be improved a lot but someone must have time and will to do this. if parallelism would be exploited on gstripe type(*) volumes then it should take less than 30 minutes no matter how large the volume is. Anyway - even with UFS which is the most fault-resilent filesystem i know - i would not recommend creating gstripe type volumes taking too many disks for the reason i already explained. For now softupdates+journal is fine, you actually have to do full fsck now and then, but at spare time. *) gstripe type means gstripe, gstripe+gmirror, graid5, graid5+gstripe, hardware matrix controller with any type of RAID configuration.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206230949490.31186>