From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Nov 7 15:32:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from pike.osd.bsdi.com (pike.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5BE37B479; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:32:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (john@dhcp241.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.241]) by pike.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id eA7NWNH69131; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:32:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20001107152711.H5112@fw.wintelcom.net> Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 15:32:48 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin To: Alfred Perlstein Subject: Re: Documenting sysV IPC tunables. Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, jkh@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 07-Nov-00 Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Alfred Perlstein [001107 14:58] wrote: >> I have a patch here that I'd like to get into LINT for 4.2, >> it _finally_ documents the sysV IPC tunables. >> >> I'll also be applying this patch to NOTES for -current. > > Bah, someone beat me for -current, but I like my patch better > because it groups the options together with the "include support for" > options. Why not reorder what is already in NOTES then rather than cutting out most of the comments? The existing comments in -current are more verbose and helpful to people trying to read it to learn. I don't think this really qualifies as a bug fix, but it is up to Jordan if he'll let you MFC it. -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message