From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 04:12:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1FA16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:12:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxfep01.bredband.com (mxfep01.bredband.com [195.54.107.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488CD43DAF for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:12:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from palle.girgensohn.se ([85.226.194.222] [85.226.194.222]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20051231041209.LFJT4422.mxfep01.bredband.com@palle.girgensohn.se> for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:12:09 +0100 Received: from palle.girgensohn.se (palle.girgensohn.se [127.0.0.1]) by palle.girgensohn.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EF017845 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:11:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:11:38 +0100 From: Palle Girgensohn To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <36777FA54324EA865B92F606@palle.girgensohn.se> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: rpc.lockd snatches all priviledged udp ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:12:52 -0000 Hi, An NFS server running FreeBSD 4.10 sometimes have the problem that all UDP ports below 1024 are used by rpc.lockd. This is not a high load server, really, it serves and handful workstations and should really cope. Is it so that rpc.lockd needs a port for each file, or else what is happening? I found a discussion on -current from Jan 2004 about this, but I couldn't find that the problem was acutually solved? Seems to be a problem with rebooting clients? BTW, can I easily "flush" the lock daemon to get some ports back? It seems hard to restart the lock daemon - I once tried but gave up and ended up rebooting the system. There must be a better way? Anyone knows if this is fixed in 6.0? thx Palle