From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Fri Sep 28 19:56:41 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CBD10B7F02
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 28 Sep 2018 19:56:41 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from leeb@ratnaling.org)
Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3FB68021C
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 19:56:40 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from leeb@ratnaling.org)
Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id e12-v6so5017429iok.12
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 12:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=ratnaling-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=IsxiVCjktVZIa/Kzo8hcT8Q8U7NgtCf0kFmQlSBANY0=;
 b=T84aG/hYe3CGzZwrMiO9BjzCavonJJcXnuWq1tRUH4qZDVvFGDksoE84YY2mUe46go
 Z79bB3VU1lGFfIgMnBEmbi2tThw/ath3hXxeYctL4Ye6Q7rOo+9v++Inh2xGKi3C3Kzt
 MlsFHLx+TS2vPsHdtx1O1bx9fWTVHhPQpG4SZbXQWhYg1XgYSp1tvCW1sTrSTrIekxTh
 9qrlj4XTW6cRU/P0yApsdw1nSGQjJhgAFODszrgN+nRHVBs7UvQVU8ybhI3HxjkOdfNR
 KxfGsfTb5lDxA1xTY4wMnvUDVX6LUDnQ4F47VVbwjNNpzgR3nNtEhwKa4nU/1wqECKIn
 bECg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=IsxiVCjktVZIa/Kzo8hcT8Q8U7NgtCf0kFmQlSBANY0=;
 b=gCLMcExv2glIomScucgAZyTUmjaSAXKHLvWvnMUE20Y30yboas+CCCNlxMaqzZsP1Z
 telSxlQ+J9b+8rjl42ryHPYH8EK58ZAjzWXtf1nHlYjdwLKqZbAiaHNQhDC/ZqN7OREu
 zzVFBwvnN3NE9If/y0tqs1SjJbs2e7H8VmA2sNSylRoOwt2OIZOG6oESIPv2M07zTzze
 V+3+SsfkKkgHOOkTAh1vv2JfRYo0f6JF+2Dk35J7D4sIKT05NBIEtDK0bilth8RL2ivi
 4DrkYtkIZHm6GGlG6MkfoFwTB7oXWq2sAAstcd62Auwk/MdCkF/haro1aIslVkoNvj4l
 adlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoidAKUJVMqKyjMjDO3xcDCbcvj6DSPhY7gzgkR9rZjM8aFXrIiC
 wDEwpmjXBKjf5zqHBghSW/WKDge3PVl6vsoMHxsCMP4F+JcNCQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV628yGtxZYRuyCEc2FpHGFJVO1Y49kTUNVt9tp07noiXKlb15LJPpKX4/6ClyEt7uUmIuCUwJjjqkv3Ras6vxrM=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:5911:: with SMTP id n17-v6mr160727iob.68.1538164599404; 
 Fri, 28 Sep 2018 12:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4f:d025:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 12:56:38
 -0700 (PDT)
From: Lee Brown <leeb@ratnaling.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 12:56:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFPNf5-dOAWDPZrHUycRdsuCBtAV02DAfb-kz2r3Ud0k=QS9Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Using ALTQ with bce and not igb on same box
To: FreeBSD-Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.27
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 19:56:41 -0000

Hi all,

I'm setting up a system with 4 NIC's, 2 igb and 2 bce.  I plan to deploy it
like:

Switch-VoIP - igb0 bce0 :: HFSC - 65mb/s-Radio
Switch-LAN  - igb1 bce1 :: HFSC - 1000mb/s-Radio

Where the traffic flow is typically igb0 <--> bce0, igb1 <--> bce1.

With reference to the patch on https://bugs.freebsd.org/
bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213257 (Crash in IGB driver with ALTQ), am I
correct in understanding I can:

Enable ALTQ in the kernel and use HFSC on the bce NIC's.
Not enable ALTQ_IGB and use the igb's without any altq's, running igb1 at
full speed.

I would apply this on 11.2 RELEASE and use ipfw.

2nd Question: Any issues running em's at full speed with HFSC?  The other
side of that radio bridge has igb's right now and I'd like to drop in a
2-port low profile PCI (
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ethernet-products/gigabit-server-adapters/1000-pt-dual-port-server-adapter-brief.html
)

Any thoughts most welcome, thanks -- lee