From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Sep 28 19:56:41 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CBD10B7F02 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 19:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leeb@ratnaling.org) Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3FB68021C for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 19:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leeb@ratnaling.org) Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id e12-v6so5017429iok.12 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 12:56:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ratnaling-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IsxiVCjktVZIa/Kzo8hcT8Q8U7NgtCf0kFmQlSBANY0=; b=T84aG/hYe3CGzZwrMiO9BjzCavonJJcXnuWq1tRUH4qZDVvFGDksoE84YY2mUe46go Z79bB3VU1lGFfIgMnBEmbi2tThw/ath3hXxeYctL4Ye6Q7rOo+9v++Inh2xGKi3C3Kzt MlsFHLx+TS2vPsHdtx1O1bx9fWTVHhPQpG4SZbXQWhYg1XgYSp1tvCW1sTrSTrIekxTh 9qrlj4XTW6cRU/P0yApsdw1nSGQjJhgAFODszrgN+nRHVBs7UvQVU8ybhI3HxjkOdfNR KxfGsfTb5lDxA1xTY4wMnvUDVX6LUDnQ4F47VVbwjNNpzgR3nNtEhwKa4nU/1wqECKIn bECg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IsxiVCjktVZIa/Kzo8hcT8Q8U7NgtCf0kFmQlSBANY0=; b=gCLMcExv2glIomScucgAZyTUmjaSAXKHLvWvnMUE20Y30yboas+CCCNlxMaqzZsP1Z telSxlQ+J9b+8rjl42ryHPYH8EK58ZAjzWXtf1nHlYjdwLKqZbAiaHNQhDC/ZqN7OREu zzVFBwvnN3NE9If/y0tqs1SjJbs2e7H8VmA2sNSylRoOwt2OIZOG6oESIPv2M07zTzze V+3+SsfkKkgHOOkTAh1vv2JfRYo0f6JF+2Dk35J7D4sIKT05NBIEtDK0bilth8RL2ivi 4DrkYtkIZHm6GGlG6MkfoFwTB7oXWq2sAAstcd62Auwk/MdCkF/haro1aIslVkoNvj4l adlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoidAKUJVMqKyjMjDO3xcDCbcvj6DSPhY7gzgkR9rZjM8aFXrIiC wDEwpmjXBKjf5zqHBghSW/WKDge3PVl6vsoMHxsCMP4F+JcNCQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV628yGtxZYRuyCEc2FpHGFJVO1Y49kTUNVt9tp07noiXKlb15LJPpKX4/6ClyEt7uUmIuCUwJjjqkv3Ras6vxrM= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:5911:: with SMTP id n17-v6mr160727iob.68.1538164599404; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 12:56:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a4f:d025:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 12:56:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Lee Brown Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 12:56:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Using ALTQ with bce and not igb on same box To: FreeBSD-Net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.27 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 19:56:41 -0000 Hi all, I'm setting up a system with 4 NIC's, 2 igb and 2 bce. I plan to deploy it like: Switch-VoIP - igb0 bce0 :: HFSC - 65mb/s-Radio Switch-LAN - igb1 bce1 :: HFSC - 1000mb/s-Radio Where the traffic flow is typically igb0 <--> bce0, igb1 <--> bce1. With reference to the patch on https://bugs.freebsd.org/ bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213257 (Crash in IGB driver with ALTQ), am I correct in understanding I can: Enable ALTQ in the kernel and use HFSC on the bce NIC's. Not enable ALTQ_IGB and use the igb's without any altq's, running igb1 at full speed. I would apply this on 11.2 RELEASE and use ipfw. 2nd Question: Any issues running em's at full speed with HFSC? The other side of that radio bridge has igb's right now and I'd like to drop in a 2-port low profile PCI ( https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ethernet-products/gigabit-server-adapters/1000-pt-dual-port-server-adapter-brief.html ) Any thoughts most welcome, thanks -- lee