From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 29 00:13:26 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA19067 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 29 Dec 1996 00:13:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pdx1.world.net (pdx1.world.net [192.243.32.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id AAA19058 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 1996 00:13:23 -0800 (PST) From: proff@suburbia.net Received: from suburbia.net (suburbia.net [203.4.184.1]) by pdx1.world.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA28721 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 1996 00:13:56 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 1940 invoked by uid 110); 29 Dec 1996 08:12:43 -0000 Message-ID: <19961229081242.1939.qmail@suburbia.net> Subject: Re: vi edit mode unstable -termcap ? In-Reply-To: from David Nugent at "Dec 29, 96 06:37:55 pm" To: davidn@sdev.usn.blaze.net.au (David Nugent) Date: Sun, 29 Dec 1996 19:12:42 +1100 (EST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Could the maintainer of nvi PLEASE use a more reasonable default > value for escapetime? This is problematic even editing in an xterm > locally on a system running under a reasonable load. Speaking of things vi. vim 4.5 is in ports, and blows nvi away.