From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Feb  5 11: 5:47 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF1837B401
	for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  5 Feb 2003 11:05:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from glamredhel.hayholt.org (hayholt.org [195.18.109.250])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7FF43F3F
	for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  5 Feb 2003 11:05:45 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from marcel@hayholt.org)
Received: from eldar.hayholt.org (unknown [192.168.0.2])
	by glamredhel.hayholt.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BEE22AF11; Wed,  5 Feb 2003 20:05:27 +0000 (WET)
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:05:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Marcel Stangenberger <marcel@hayholt.org>
To: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
Cc: Philip Hallstrom <philip@adhesivemedia.com>,
	"" <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: building a VPN with FreeBSD 4.7p3
In-Reply-To: <3E415935.6030207@potentialtech.com>
Message-ID: <20030205200300.N565@eldar.hayholt.org>
References: <20030204080406.Q23132-100000@cypress.adhesivemedia.com>
 <20030204214707.X52428@eldar.hayholt.org> <3E40466E.3000906@potentialtech.com>
 <20030205125500.A53666@eldar.hayholt.org> <3E414446.3060500@potentialtech.com>
 <20030205192845.W565@eldar.hayholt.org> <3E415935.6030207@potentialtech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-questions.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-questions>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-questions>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Well, nat is definately not a requirement for a vtun, it's just that it's
> such a common scenerio that it gets lots of howtos written about it.
>

ok, i'll try to set it up without the usage of NAT

> And I would bet that (if you're using RFC-1918 addys as you say) that you
> really _are_ using nat.  It's just not FreeBSD that's doing it, it's probably
> the router in your diagram that has built-in nat capabilities.
>

you're correct on that.
i've just lost my connection to the testmachine on another network so i
can't continue the test now, tomorrow will be the soonest

Marcel

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message