From owner-freebsd-security  Fri Feb 21 09:34:54 1997
Return-Path: <owner-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA07493
          for security-outgoing; Fri, 21 Feb 1997 09:34:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phobos.frii.com (phobos.frii.com [204.144.241.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA07487
          for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 1997 09:34:49 -0800 (PST)
From: gnat@frii.com
Received: from elara.frii.com (elara.frii.com [204.144.241.9]) by phobos.frii.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id KAA13833 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 1997 10:34:29 -0700 (MST)
Received: (from gnat@localhost) by elara.frii.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) id KAA03840; Fri, 21 Feb 1997 10:34:25 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 10:34:25 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199702211734.KAA03840@elara.frii.com>
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: 2.1.7 requires a rebuild of /usr/local binaries?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.103)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I've just installed 2.1.7 (upgrading from 2.1.5) on my own machine,
prior to upgrading all our servers.  The advisory re: the setlocale
bug said to rebuild all statically linked binaries and probably all
dynamically linked ones too.

Going to the 2.1.7-RELEASE/packages directory, however, I see it's
just a link to the 2.1.6 packages directory.  Does this mean that I
don't have to rebuild all my binaries after all?

Nat