From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 5 19:39:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD08516A417 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 19:39:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5899D13C447 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 19:39:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D12BB47945; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:20:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25016-04; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:20:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-89-241-126.eastlink.ca [24.89.241.126]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B97AB47943; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:20:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64F9EAAE9; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:20:04 -0300 (ADT) Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:19:53 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Bill Moran , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20070921123624.77365827.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <1190391196.2346.4.camel@viola.izb.knu.ac.kr> <20070921123624.77365827.wmoran@potentialtech.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: bh@izb.knu.ac.kr Subject: Re: Netcraft do not display uptime graph, why? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:39:14 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 That URL states that we 'default to 1000Hz' ... is it lowerable, and what are the ramifications of doing so? My first thought is that 1000Hz is giving us higher timer granularity (1000 cycles per sec vs 100 cycles per sec) ... is this correct? Thx - --On Friday, September 21, 2007 12:36:24 -0400 Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Byung-Hee HWANG : > >> Hi there, >> >> My machine is FreeBSD 6.x currently. But Netcraft do not display of my >> machine's uptime graph. When I used FreeBSD 4.x, actually I could see >> the uptime graph in Netcraft. >> >> What happened? > > http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/accuracy.html#hz1000 > > -- > Bill Moran > http://www.potentialtech.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHBo5Z4QvfyHIvDvMRAjxKAJ9UKlOnb7A61yPA7p7OTmAO7gK/2gCgvq4K Av0c/f0kq1JaRepAhnWofgo= =La6B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----