From owner-freebsd-security  Mon Apr 20 17:47:30 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA10707
          for freebsd-security-outgoing; Mon, 20 Apr 1998 17:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA10536
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 21 Apr 1998 00:46:37 GMT
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA28075;
	Mon, 20 Apr 1998 17:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, Wes Peters <softweyr@xmission.com>,
        Penisoara Adrian <ady@warpnet.ro>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Using MD5 insted of DES for passwd ecnryption 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 20 Apr 1998 21:24:27 +0800."
             <199804201324.VAA04518@spinner.netplex.com.au> 
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 17:45:26 -0700
Message-ID: <28067.893119526@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> However, the thought of having ld.so on / and a dynamic sh and init seems
> to make some people break out into a cold sweat...

Damn the torpedos!  Full speed ahead! ;-)

					Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message