Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:27:15 +0200 From: mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? Message-ID: <20190625082715.lt27gdyimo3etpjz@deathbolt.927589452.space> In-Reply-To: <20190625083824.2c259fbd7ef91efcc3857e77@sohara.org> References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> <CANJ8om6WmNQWibnSCMR2hf09he-wWBUnBmY5Mnn7%2BNtvUHhcBQ@mail.gmail.com> <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> <20190625071943.vwswhj2lh6ctj4vy@deathbolt.927589452.space> <20190625083824.2c259fbd7ef91efcc3857e77@sohara.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19-06-25 08:38:24, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:19:43 +0200 > mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de wrote: > > > The hardest thing is getting a real IPv&/ bigger than a /64 as this is > > required by most systems. > > > For lab work a /48 over a HE tunnel should do fine, only the router > knows it's a tunnel :) TBH: I just went live with it in my (home) network and gladly my provider announced a /48 per user
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190625082715.lt27gdyimo3etpjz>