From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 25 17:43:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467B916A480; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BA143D4C; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:43:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3PHhEHb077350; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:43:14 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:43:14 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20060425162656.GC54244@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20060425213313.R71240@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20060423201732.GA74905@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060424091803.L20593@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060424215650.P36233@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060424181531.GA13774@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425001751.S44618@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060424202859.GA18457@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425004405.G44618@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060424205026.GA18844@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425134418.J57625@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060425080932.1rv9hq0rcws4wc84@www.wolves.k12.mo.us> <20060425162656.GC54244@xor.obsecurity.org> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:43:14 +0400 (MSD) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:43:17 -0000 On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: KK> OK, I wish you and others had responded to my call for testing a month KK> or more ago :) All (both) of the responses indicated that the quota KK> problems had been fixed following changes made then. At this point it KK> may be too late for 6.x, but we'll see. Well, I'm quite sure this change is not too disruptive, and it *does* fix quota panics, so I hope RE will aprove this (CC:'d) Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------