From owner-freebsd-security Sun Nov 21 14:42:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from wit395301.student.utwente.nl (wit395301.student.utwente.nl [130.89.235.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4916A1581A for ; Sun, 21 Nov 1999 14:42:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeroen@vangelderen.org) Received: from [10.235.121.14] (helo=vangelderen.org) by wit395301.student.utwente.nl with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 11pfgG-00023b-00; Sun, 21 Nov 1999 23:42:00 +0100 Message-ID: <3838750D.47B0B4C3@vangelderen.org> Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 23:41:17 +0100 From: "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Behrens Cc: Dug Song , Tomaz Borstnar , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenSSH & AllowHosts References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Matt Behrens wrote: > : OpenSSH intentionally deviates from the original SSH in many ways - see > : > : http://violet.ibs.com.au/openssh/files/UPGRADING > : > : for a brief summary. > > One deviation I know I'd appreciate would be DH/DSA support instead > of perpetually being tied to RSA. I did some OpenBSD mailing list > searches and haven't found anything concerning this; was this ever > discussed? DH/DSA can not be supported in the SSH version 1.x protocol. It is in the SSH 2.0 protocol but I doubt OpenSSH will support that in the very near future because it would entail a significant rewrite. Cheers, Jeroen -- Jeroen C. van Gelderen - jeroen@vangelderen.org Interesting read: http://www.vcnet.com/bms/ JLF To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message