From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jun 16 13:26:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to (pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to [213.130.163.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E472C37B42B for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 13:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from LUCKYVAIO (unknown [209.148.102.121]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9C03662D; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 22:26:39 +0200 (CEST) From: "Lucky Green" To: "'Mike Silbersack'" Cc: Subject: RE: LINT CPU features table Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 13:24:31 -0700 Message-ID: <002d01c21573$d692ea50$0100a8c0@LUCKYVAIO> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <20020612150308.W28937-100000@patrocles.silby.com> Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Silbersack wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Lucky Green wrote: > > > [This inquiry found no takers on -questions, so I am trying it on > > -hackers] > > > > I found the list of CPU options in LINT to be not very accessible. > > What would be considerably more useful, perhaps in addition to the > > information in LINT, would be a table of CPU's, with a checkbox for > > each CPU feature that should/could be enabled for this > particular CPU. > > > > Is anybody here aware of such a table? If not, is anybody > here able to > > perhaps create such a table and add it to the Handbook? I > believe it > > would be of substantial help to the user. > > > > "OK, I have an AMD K6-333". [User looks down the "AMD K6" > row of the > > table]. "I can turn on feature L, M, and Y". > > > > Thanks in advance, > > --Lucky > > For most cpus, there is little to be gained by fiddling with > cpu specific options. Hence, there is little reason to > provide a complex table; having all cpu types enabled as in > GENERIC is just fine. If only a few CPU's would benefit from the CPU-specific options, creating a table of CPU options for those few CPU's should be all the simpler. What I am I missing? Thanks, --Lucky To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message