From owner-cvs-all Mon Jan 4 22:33:04 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA06605 for cvs-all-outgoing; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 22:33:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (dryad.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.156.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA06599; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 22:32:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp) Received: from ett.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (ett.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.156.43]) by mail.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (8.8.6/3.4Wbeta6-SAT1.0) with ESMTP id PAA01704; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 15:32:32 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp) Received: from localhost by ett.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (8.8.8/sat-V0.6) id PAA22025; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 15:32:31 +0900 (JST) To: kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au Cc: simokawa@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/giftrans Makefile ports/graphics/mpeg2codec/patches patch-aa ports/graphics/splitmpg/patches patch-aa ports/graphics/xdl/patches patch-aa In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:38:05 +1030 (CST)" References: X-Face: OE([KxWyJI0r[R~S/>7ia}SJ)i%a,$-9%7{*yihQk|]gl}2p#"oXmX/fT}Bn7:#j7i14gu$ jgR\S*&C3R/pJX Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 15:32:30 +0900 From: Hidetoshi Shimokawa X-Dispatcher: imput version 980905(IM100) Lines: 41 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk kkennawa> --- ports/graphics/mpeg2codec/patches/patch-aa 1996/12/09 15:37:24 1.2 kkennawa> +++ /home/ncvs/ports/graphics/mpeg2codec/patches/patch-aa 1999/01/05 kkennawa> 06:00:09 1.3 kkennawa> @@ -33,9 +33,8 @@ kkennawa> # GNU gcc kkennawa> # kkennawa> -CC = gcc kkennawa> --CFLAGS = -O2 kkennawa> +CC = cc kkennawa> -+CFLAGS = -O2 -m486 kkennawa> + CFLAGS = -O2 kkennawa> kkennawa> all: mpeg2decode mpeg2encode kkennawa> kkennawa> Erm, wouldn't it be better to just do kkennawa> CFLAGS ?= -O2 kkennawa> CFLAGS += Yes, it should be better. There are many broken ports on alpha. For "m486" option problem, I just edit patch files directly and check whether it can be built. Because I cannot do running test for all ports, I would like to keep changes as small as possible to avoid breaking working ports. I'd like to leave these kind of fix to the maintainer or someone who can check carefully. kkennawa> like I suggested on freebsd-ports when the PR was opened? Alpha people kkennawa> presumably wouldn't have CFLAGS=-m486 defined, so this works for them as well kkennawa> as anyone else who wants to use different optimization switches than the port kkennawa> was written with. I agree with your idea. /\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa \/ simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp PGP public key: finger -l simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message