From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 26 21: 1:23 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B89D37B401 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 21:01:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0555643F1E for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 21:01:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from katana.zip.com.au (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA19888; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:01:11 +1100 Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:03:14 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: walt Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADSUP: Final call for NODEVFS and NO_GEOM options In-Reply-To: <3E346062.4040905@hotmail.com> Message-ID: <20030127153344.V19383-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, walt wrote: > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > This is the final call for users using NODEVFS and NO_GEOM options! > > I marvel at my own temerity. I normally would never presume to speak > for Bruce Evans but I haven't seen a post from him for many days. I > think he would probably object to eliminating NO_GEOM based on his > past postings. > > If I presume too much by speaking for him I humbly apologize. Thanks for your concern. I don't care about further axing of these options since they are already broken beyond repair. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message