From owner-freebsd-current  Wed May 28 03:11:19 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA04577
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 28 May 1997 03:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache.relcom.ru [194.58.229.133])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA04515;
          Wed, 28 May 1997 03:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA00693;
	Wed, 28 May 1997 14:10:14 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 14:10:11 +0400 (MSD)
From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To: FreeBSD-current <current@freebsd.org>, wpaul@freebsd.org,
        markm@freebsd.org
Subject: Duplicate DES code in libc/rpc and secure/lib/des
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970528140441.676A-100000@nagual.pp.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I found the same DES code in des/rpc_* files and rpc/des_* files and
have two questions:

1) What about export restrictions (rpc/des* affected), is situation
changed?

2) Do we really need to duplicate the same code in several places?
I think that secure/lib/des/rpc_* files should be removed.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
<ache@null.net>
http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/