From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org  Tue Jul  2 10:44:15 2019
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51DA15CF29E;
 Tue,  2 Jul 2019 10:44:15 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
 (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B918015F;
 Tue,  2 Jul 2019 10:44:15 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org)
Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id 1489FD398; Tue,  2 Jul 2019 10:44:15 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 10:44:15 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
Cc: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@anongoth.pl>, Greg Lewis <glewis@freebsd.org>,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r505640 - head/java/openjdk11
Message-ID: <20190702104415.GB59302@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201907012118.x61LIIQr011692@repo.freebsd.org>
 <20190702072450.GA17073@KGPE-D16>
 <20190702082607.GA45590@FreeBSD.org>
 <20190702083515.seykaqqjd77zyyr2@ivaldir.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190702083515.seykaqqjd77zyyr2@ivaldir.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 40B918015F
X-Spamd-Bar: ------
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.94 / 15.00];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.94)[-0.938,0]
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>, 
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 10:44:15 -0000

On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:35:15AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 08:26:08AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 09:24:50AM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> > > Why not use USES=compiler:c11 instead of setting manually USE_GCC=yes?
> > 
> > Technically they're semantically not the same; while pulling C11-capable
> > compiler might fix the problem, you're still telling the reader that
> > you're pulling C11-capable compiler, while USE_GCC means that you want
> > GCC, devoid of particular reasons.
> > 
> > In practice, compiler:c11 often used as compiler:modern. [...]
> 
> Actually the majority of addition of compiler:c11 are wrong (from the one
> I have been able to check)

I tend to agree. :(

> It would be really nice to stop blindy using compiler:c11 ;)

Right; unfortunately, often people who commit these changes do not bother
to check with the actual code to see if a different/better solution is
available (or even in order).

./danfe