From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 25 04:47:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2D716A41F for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:47:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rmeek@russellmeek.net) Received: from a.mx.russellmeek.net (91.59.118.70.cfl.res.rr.com [70.118.59.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC15A43D5A for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:47:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rmeek@russellmeek.net) Received: (qmail 39854 invoked by uid 89); 25 Nov 2005 04:47:05 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 38805, pid: 39276, t: 0.5007s scanners: attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.87.1/m:34/d:1191 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on prometheus.russellmeek.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.172.1.125?) (russell@russellmeek.net@192.172.1.125) by a.mx.russellmeek.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 25 Nov 2005 04:47:05 -0000 Message-ID: <43869750.8000201@russellmeek.net> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 23:47:12 -0500 From: "Russelll E. Meek" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4384E8F6.6070308@russellmeek.net> <20051124024033.GB13075@xor.obsecurity.org> <43854C94.6040206@russellmeek.net> <20051124204154.GA30073@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051124204154.GA30073@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE Scheduler FreeBSD 6 - Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:47:08 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 12:16:04AM -0500, Russell E. Meek wrote: > > >>Kris Kennaway wrote: >> >> >> >>>On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:11:02PM -0500, Russell Meek wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Is anyone here currently using the *SCHED_ULE* scheduler in a server >>>>enviroment, production or non? >>>> >>>>Pros? Cons? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>This question has been asked quite often, so you would have done well >>>to research the answer before asking :) >>> >>>It's slower on the workloads I've tested and is not stable on machines >>>with many CPUs (e.g. 12). >>> >>>Kris >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Kris, >> >>This question has been asked quite often, so you would have done well >>to research the answer before asking :) >> >>Shitty remark, not wise to jump to conclusions. >> >> >>Common Sense would dictate that it would be highly retarded for me to >>ask a question that I have not at least ever so slightly attempted to >>look into. >> >> > >Since when has common sense ever been a guide to human behaviour? :-) > >Sorry for being snippy, it's just that I've answered this question >about 24 times in public. > >Kris > > Not a problem, you are right though, if more people used common sense I am sure the world would be a better place. Thanks