From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 19 19:11:36 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5980716A406;
	Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:11:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B4413C45D;
	Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:11:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8270E2083;
	Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:11:32 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706602049;
	Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:11:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 59FC75410; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:11:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@casselton.net>
References: <200704191736.l3JHad0E057895@casselton.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:11:32 +0200
In-Reply-To: <200704191736.l3JHad0E057895@casselton.net> (Mark Tinguely's
	message of "Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:36:39 -0500 (CDT)")
Message-ID: <86y7ko2n8b.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,
	MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au
Subject: Re: IBM / FreeBSD Install problem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:11:36 -0000

Mark Tinguely <tinguely@casselton.net> writes:
> I suggested that in email too, but looking closer, I think the MAXCPU
> needs to be increased because the cpu number uses the apic_id. Or could
> that be changed with a logical CPU to APIC ID lookup?
>
> Isn't the APIC IDs programmable? not that I am suggesting that, I
> can think of headaches of all the places (like interrupt tables)
> where it needs to be changed, not to mention the worry that the
> lower APIC IDs were assigned to IOAPICs.

I don't know, you'd have to ask jhb@ about the details.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no