From owner-freebsd-bugs  Fri May 12 04:10:17 1995
Return-Path: bugs-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA26551
          for bugs-outgoing; Fri, 12 May 1995 04:10:17 -0700
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA26537
          ; Fri, 12 May 1995 04:09:49 -0700
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id VAA23467; Fri, 12 May 1995 21:07:45 +1000
Date: Fri, 12 May 1995 21:07:45 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199505121107.VAA23467@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: rgrimes@freefall.cdrom.com, rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
Subject: Re: Changed information for PR gnu/397
Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com, henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu
Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> State-Changed-Why: 
>> /home/ncvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/man/man/man.c,v  <--  man.c
>> new revision: 1.12; previous revision: 1.11
>> 

>What do you folks think about what I just used for the reason for
>changing the status?  Basically that is a cut and paste of the
>output from the cvs commit.  I think this is what we should be
>doing instead of manually saying ``fixed in revision blah of blah''.

Doesn't revision 1.12 always follow 1.11?  "Fixed in ..." is more
readable.  Most users will see at most the final source file and
won't want to know where it was in ncvs.  The won't be able to see
the Id in too many cases.  man.c doesn't have one, at least in
revision 1.11 :-).

Bruce