From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Apr 18 21:22:16 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA29678 for bugs-outgoing; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 21:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA29673 Thu, 18 Apr 1996 21:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id GAA07310; Fri, 19 Apr 1996 06:21:57 +0200 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id GAA27453; Fri, 19 Apr 1996 06:21:57 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.7.5/8.6.9) id XAA03014; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 23:55:56 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199604182155.XAA03014@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: bin/1019 To: ache@astral.msk.su (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 23:55:56 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, scrappy@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, core@freebsd.org, muir@idiom.com Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199604182136.BAA00940@astral.msk.su> from "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" at Apr 19, 96 01:36:48 am X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= wrote: > > dialer?), but the reason that some PPP packages don't understand a > > regular Unix login sequence but wanna use PAP or CHAP instead doesn't > > sound totally unreasonable. At least, everything is hidden inside a > > If you use PAP/CHAP only, don't even start getty over this line, > just start pppd on it directly. It's my understanding that the site where David M. Sharnoff (sp?) is wants to provide both services on the same modem lines, PPP (with sole PAP/CHAP authentication), and regular (or UUCP) logins. The problem is caused by Netcrap not allowing for a regular login: sequence, apparently. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)