From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 27 20:57:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from luke.cpl.net (luke.cpl.net [209.150.92.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2978715094 for ; Thu, 27 May 1999 20:57:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shawn@cpl.net) Received: from SHAWN (shawn.megadeth.org [209.203.102.43]) by luke.cpl.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA27680; Thu, 27 May 1999 20:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990527204731.00e60d80@cpl.net> X-Sender: shawn@cpl.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 20:47:31 -0700 To: "Chuck Youse" , "Ken Lui" , "Vittorio Mori" From: Shawn Ramsey Subject: Re: R: Spontaneous reboot while CPU usage is high Cc: In-Reply-To: <007001bea8a4$680ae540$4d7b5ccf@f8m7n1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 08:52 PM 5/27/99 -0400, Chuck Youse wrote: >I hate to point out the obvious, but generally, folks, CPUs are rated for >given clock speeds for a reason. If you're having strange software >problems, the first thing to do is stop overclocking. If you can't >reproduce the problem when running at the appropriate, rated clockspeed, >then you know what your problem most likely is. The problem with then most likely be not enough cooling. :) I wouldn't overclock a system that your livelyhood depended on, but less important systems that could use the speed, why not? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message