From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 2 00:19:01 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA05142 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 00:19:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rebma.ghostwheel.com (rebma.ghostwheel.com [207.201.56.159]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA05133 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 00:18:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd-stb@ghostwheel.com) Received: from avalon (avalon [207.201.56.88]) by rebma.ghostwheel.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id AAA02849; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 00:18:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd-stb@ghostwheel.com) Message-Id: <4.1.19990202000157.0096b940@pop2.ghostwheel.com> X-Sender: fbsd-stb@pop2.ghostwheel.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 00:14:54 -0800 To: Greg Lehey , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Chris Knight Subject: Vinum in 2.2-stable, but broken? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I noticed that vinum was introduced into 2.2.8 within the past week or so, but it isn't compiled in a 'make world', and it doesn't compile directly. Is is safe to assume that this made in into 2.2-stable by accident? If so, it should probably be removed by someone with that ability. -ck To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message