From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jul 19 06:28:36 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA25537 for current-outgoing; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 06:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA25532; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 06:28:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA18837; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 06:30:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199707191330.GAA18837@implode.root.com> To: sthaug@nethelp.no cc: jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I am contemplating the following change... In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 19 Jul 1997 15:23:20 +0200." <15909.869318600@verdi.nethelp.no> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 06:30:36 -0700 Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> irq 5 is used because it is the standard for all 8bit Western Digital >> 8003 cards and all 3Com 3c503 boards. I think it might even be the standard >> for Novell NE1000/NE2000 cards. In other words, it's far more common than >> irq 10 which is only found on 16bit WD/SMC cards. > >It's not the default for all NE2000 clones though. I have several Kingston >NE2000 clones where the default IRQ is 3. They work very well (even if I >normally configure them for a different IRQ). Yikes! The default is the COM2 irq? Evil. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project