From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jan 12 12:50:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCDF37B41E for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:50:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0CKo5943999; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:50:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:50:05 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201122050.g0CKo5943999@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Ken Stailey Subject: Re: ports/33818: Bootable ITS image for KLH-10 PDP-10 emulator Reply-To: Ken Stailey Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/33818; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ken Stailey To: Alan Eldridge Cc: FreeBSD Bugs Subject: Re: ports/33818: Bootable ITS image for KLH-10 PDP-10 emulator Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:44:08 -0500 Alan Eldridge wrote: >On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 03:08:14PM -0500, Ken Stailey wrote: > >>Alan Eldridge wrote: >> >>>On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 11:01:03AM -0800, Kenneth Stailey wrote: >>> >>>>>Number: 33818 >>>>>Category: ports >>>>>Synopsis: Bootable ITS image for KLH-10 PDP-10 emulator >>>>>Description: >>>>> >>>> Bootable ITS image for KLH-10 PDP-10 emulator. Disregart prior >>>>submission. The image is rather large. 45MB compressed download and >>>>170MB uncompressed. The port tries not to store two uncompressed copies >>>>during installation ever. >>>> >>>Umm, should this be marked NO_CDROM due to its size? >>> >>>NO_CDROM= This is just a really big (45M) data file. >>> >>>That's a big chunk of real estate on a CD for something that < 1% of the >>>user population is going to look at. >>> >>I was asking about that but I guess I didn't know what to ask. >>Isn't >> >>NO_PACKAGE= ignores cflags # for now >> > >1. That's not a reason to no-package it. > >2. No, NO_PACKAGE is not transient. > >3. There's not a problem with PACKAGE-ing it. The ftp servers have room. >I'm concerned about putting the package on the CDROM. That's what NO_CDROM >is for. > >NO_PACKAGE implies NO_CDROM. >NO_CDROM does not imply NO_PACKAGE. > >Why do you want to NO_PACKAGE the klh-10? Is it huge too? (I haven't >looked at it yet.) > I'm new at this? :) Anyway it needs this patch to work/klh10-2.0a/src/Mk-fbx86.mk --- Mk-fbx86.mk.DIST Sat Jan 12 15:40:10 2002 +++ Mk-fbx86.mk Sat Jan 12 15:40:55 2002 @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ # Build definitions SRC = ../../src -CFLAGS = -c -g3 -O -I. -I$(SRC) +CFLAGS += -c -g3 -O -I. -I$(SRC) CFLAGS_LINT = -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wshadow \ -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes \ -Wmissing-declarations -Wredundant-decls Then NO_PACKAGE can be removed. The emulator is pretty small. The ITS filesystem image is the big part. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message