From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jul 9 08:35:53 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id IAA02278 for current-outgoing; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 08:35:53 -0700 Received: (from phk@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id IAA02269 ; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 08:35:51 -0700 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199507091535.IAA02269@freefall.cdrom.com> Subject: Re: Version numbers of the different branches? To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 08:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Richard Wackerbarth" at Jul 9, 95 08:43:33 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 749 Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > >("BUILT-950703" ? Hey, He hasn't got the "ls -s panic" patch that > >got comitted on july 5th !) > > "BUILT-950708" -- Does he have it? > > IMHO, "2.1d0803" where 0803 represents the CTM update level > or "2.1d950706" where that represents the date of the source file sup > would be more useful. The CTM sequence number will not be put into it. CTM has nothing to do with our kernel. If anything we should have a cronjob update the version-string automatically every day. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Just that: dried leaves in boiling water ?