From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 2 07:05:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DCF16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 07:05:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C36C43D39 for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 07:05:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mdcki@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 444 invoked by uid 65534); 2 Jan 2004 15:05:11 -0000 Received: from Bc171.b.pppool.de (EHLO gmx.net) (213.7.193.113) by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 02 Jan 2004 16:05:11 +0100 X-Authenticated: #17236065 Message-ID: <3FF588A6.8040101@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:05:10 +0100 From: Marcin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031224 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arne Schwabe References: <86n097dco9.fsf@kamino.rfc1149.org> <3FF4D4E7.4000400@gmx.net> <86lloqwo44.fsf@kamino.rfc1149.org> In-Reply-To: <86lloqwo44.fsf@kamino.rfc1149.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Synaptics Touchpad xfree driver hack :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 15:05:17 -0000 Arne Schwabe wrote: > Marcin Dalecki writes: > > >>Arne Schwabe wrote: >> >>>Hi, >> >>A long long time ago ... I solved this problem in a way >>relying on the fine mouse support infrastructure found in >>FreeBSD (aka mounsd). Hardware management and sharig it >>IMHO something kernels are for. This way even the mouse >>on console will still be available. Patch attached... >> > > > > Hm that looks better then my code. But after my first it seems that it > misses the support for a second looptrhough mouse and emulation of a > mouse wheel. The first one should be not too difficult to support but > the 2. one will be more tricky imo. > I think I will look into it. > I would love to see it enhanced. Personally I did only as much as was necessary for my pleasure. BTW> The main problem with enhancements to this patch was the fact that the moused (where the complex operations should go) talks a differential protocol with the kernel about positions. Which is bull-shit on ballocks in first place of course...