Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:04:47 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <bjk@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: old style kernel configuration Message-ID: <CAF6rxgk8t95zxx-7iJsvxtKrGbximY6tkYmVsu1xMStWputt4g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50ADAFA8.4020501@freebsd.org> References: <CAF6rxgmxiaA1twJf%2BKMv=ZpxCWp1MdL5GEEEFLwBuRqcGpctdQ@mail.gmail.com> <50ADAFA8.4020501@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21 November 2012 23:52, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 11/21/12 5:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> >> I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents. >> While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the >> "old style" kernel configuration involving running config(1) manually. >> >> Is there any value in keeping this documented as an alternative to >> "make buildkernel" or should it be treated as an implementation detail? > > > I still do it quite often Could you explain why? I think I will keep the documentation but I want to update it with some explanation of when one wants to use the old method. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgk8t95zxx-7iJsvxtKrGbximY6tkYmVsu1xMStWputt4g>