Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:13:45 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gustau_P=E9rez?= <gperez@entel.upc.edu> To: David Thiel <lx@redundancy.redundancy.org> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: shotwell port Message-ID: <4F340CD9.5050906@entel.upc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20120203182329.GL82239@redundancy.redundancy.org> References: <20120203003613.GK82239@redundancy.redundancy.org> <4F2B9830.5040308@entel.upc.edu> <20120203182329.GL82239@redundancy.redundancy.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/02/2012 19:23, David Thiel wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 09:17:28AM +0100, Gustau Pérez wrote: >> On 03/02/2012 01:36, David Thiel wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have another update to the shotwell port. I suspect I should go ahead >>> and take maintainership of it - any objection? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> David >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> I'm running vala (0.14.1) from the area51 repository and I had to >> tweak the shotwell port to make it compile. Can you provide me the >> update so I can test it? > Sure, diff attached. Hi David, I've been playing with shotwell port. I noticed I had to manually remove the --fatal-warnings in $WRKDIR/{Makefile,plugins/Makefile.mk} or it won't compile with my vala (0.14.1 from area51). I can generate a patch from your port so shotwell can compile with vala 0.14.1. I guess your port compiles fine with valac from ports. And that new version of shotwell appears to work fine for me. So I would take ownership and update the port. When the vala compiler gets updated in the ports tree to 0.14, I can send you the patch needed (which is very simple). Thank you!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F340CD9.5050906>