From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 1 11:24:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E630C16A41F for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:24:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8051A43D46 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:24:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7ABA300A; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:24:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id BEB3D657A; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:24:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:24:02 +0100 From: Marc Olzheim To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20051101112402.GA4878@stack.nl> References: <436116D3.908@samsco.org> <20051031151809.GA83253@stack.nl> <43663A0A.4040608@samsco.org> <20051031160150.GB87483@stack.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051031160150.GB87483@stack.nl> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 6.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4 X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Marc Olzheim , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:24:05 -0000 --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 05:01:50PM +0100, Marc Olzheim wrote: > > Is the 'VM/VFS overruns' item still a problem? That was likely fixed a= =20 > > couple of months ago. If not then it's definitely something that I'll > > track for the 6.1 release. >=20 > I'll retest that one, but it wasn't fixed yet in -CURRENT of a month ago. I'm happy to confirm that it works fine now in today's RELENG_6. :-) Marc --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDZ1BSezjnobFOgrERApNYAJ4pIMlwdVXrHuH4GLncUUkCa2NsqgCgxF7f IXxSdfkTgpA3oH3KRrE0hy0= =OJdq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--