From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 24 00:10:11 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6927F16A420 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB3F13C45D for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so1815636mue for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 17:10:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=XoUjxFo9zJTzUZtcGyzaMtA8CYYjJVFhJtbmJtlvCNw=; b=HGR+TAA+Cgq7abVVboxhC3X4aE+DzZbMQIPnLzo+mDME91wjJM08FOeOzY0VVW+5RQN4U6dAjlcutMc3r99SnmDT0PeQ1Uq5hl/I1TzjHhOuTeV+nACSoLyJsHpQbqYwsrISKu3paJwHcZ79joPSs/eT0wgEwrmfJpwDOBBFW8Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Hm1neQILy/NdjFKZbx3bIr/P34LqYRO9SMDo4cS2lQC1XT2Xz8vvNWn/52kqsJCLn6LlQE1TC8eqtLkezoHfBoH9lhV/guy2fB4aELvm7BmiIy+ZMVhsntQ7V/UBf2nNdm3lClY+MlxQvaDHY/5ih3nzVUTJzQHqAx73D8qM1zc= Received: by 10.86.28.5 with SMTP id b5mr4276467fgb.1190592608945; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 17:10:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.2.1 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 17:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <499c70c0709231710r228afb76qf740a01e81ef106a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:10:05 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" To: "Kris Kennaway" In-Reply-To: <46F6F7C9.6030309@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46F609DC.3070809@melbpc.org.au> <20070923110135.C547@10.0.0.1> <499c70c0709231508o1d57bd36gaf654e33c4a2ad06@mail.gmail.com> <20070923160448.I547@10.0.0.1> <46F6F7C9.6030309@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Jeff Roberson , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [panic] sched_priority: invalid interactive priority 124 score -4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:10:11 -0000 On 9/24/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > > >> On 9/23/07, Jeff Roberson wrote: > >>> On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Peter Kostouros wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> I received the abovementioned panic on a system csup'ed and build a > >>>> few hours > >>>> ago and have attached a debug session I hope will help. > >>> > >>> Peter, > >>> > >>> Thanks for your debugging efforts. The problem was with my most recent > >>> commit. You can back out to 1.207 or try this patch, which csjp reports > >>> fixes the problem: > >>> > >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/ulebugs.diff > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Jeff > >> > >> Jeff, > >> > >> fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/ulebugs.diff && patch < > >> ulebugs.diff > >> ulebugs.diff 100% of 914 B 8767 kBps > >> Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > >> The text leading up to this was: > >> -------------------------- > >> |Index: sched_ule.c > >> |=================================================================== > >> |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c,v > >> |retrieving revision 1.208 > >> |diff -u -r1.208 sched_ule.c > >> |--- sched_ule.c 22 Sep 2007 02:20:14 -0000 1.208 > >> |+++ sched_ule.c 23 Sep 2007 17:33:02 -0000 > >> -------------------------- > >> File to patch: > >> No file found--skip this patch? [n] y > >> Skipping patch... > >> Hunk #1 ignored at 1410. > >> Hunk #2 ignored at 1865. > >> 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to sched_ule.c.rej > > > > If you're not running 1.208 the patch won't apply. On the positive > > side, that also means you don't have this bug. > > Looks like he's running patch from the wrong directory, i.e. not > sys/kern/ where sched_ule.c is. > > Kris Yup, I corrected it, sorry for the noise. cd /usr/src/sys/kern/ && fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/ulebugs.diff && patch < ulebugs.diff ulebugs.diff 100% of 2016 B 13 MBps Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sched_ule.c |=================================================================== |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c,v |retrieving revision 1.208 |diff -u -r1.208 sched_ule.c |--- sched_ule.c 22 Sep 2007 02:20:14 -0000 1.208 |+++ sched_ule.c 23 Sep 2007 23:45:36 -0000 -------------------------- Patching file sched_ule.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 1410. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1858 (offset -7 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 1867 (offset -7 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 2570 (offset 1 line). Hunk #5 succeeded at 2575 (offset -7 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 2612 (offset 1 line). 1 out of 6 hunks failed--saving rejects to sched_ule.c.rej done -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/