From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Jul 20 18:38:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5D99A6410 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:38:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbb@semihalf.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FF8F11BB for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:38:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbb@semihalf.com) Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so34587877wib.1 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:38:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=q2sl2oBjHwPxlxjhTALvcmy+nlRfZv9schjUN/q4YA0=; b=Ixz9fxOCsURVGo1NG4XsrrArFlz5F1WqNx/d1PFEse/VeOuOmO6mUkfncb5iD3HSdy sRtoVtKdON+5+N+yEwX66GvPTXUA+m0vCwkxpvnLmmhx1Jt9B2UEK4WtJ+/laTaCAA4d D+AI4g9p+umCG4bHcGNLz0BixVt7YVaWIfdrjSCiNAVld8vUrCWWWOeAbs5IL1v68myC GDTpOns6auhTLiHtVw7VAreJQ8lnb2YWxKMB7SrLQX8ltX5Y37ZnFankjQ4fWMKWfkti QNeOmOgK/YdoZFI7GIzV/wBqxOkxM6jEV25Sqem/5JZIBPYzDWo3wAmx85guRx1QLKDf o8mQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlVqsWL41plgYaqpZVQ1wl7IiSknFgRc7AJAFcxdARnZkD4M4C3yUPlXoDSpy5+3HCKgn3M X-Received: by 10.180.84.202 with SMTP id b10mr24232863wiz.23.1437417492644; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:38:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.75.12 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:37:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1437410034.1334.415.camel@freebsd.org> References: <2b488f78c7cd7f840f16f376dbb3408a@localhost.localdomain> <55A978B8.6080008@m5p.com> <55AA3D5D.5070907@m5p.com> <20150720160835.GW8523@funkthat.com> <1437410034.1334.415.camel@freebsd.org> From: Zbigniew Bodek Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 20:37:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Differential] [Updated] D3121: Don't allow malloc() to wait for resource while holding a lock in ITS To: Ian Lepore Cc: John-Mark Gurney , "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" , phabric-admin@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:38:15 -0000 That is why I was asking whether you don't want to see any messages at all. Before Phabricator we used to send patch to the mailing list for review. Now the e-mail is sent automatically by Phabricator but unfortunately all other stuff related to that diff is also being sent. If Phabricator cannot limit its messages to the "announcement" that there is a patch for review we can basically get back to sending "heads up" on the mailing list "hey there is a patch for review here: " without adding mailing list to the subscribers on Phabric. (Or separate mailing list if that is what you prefer). I always add mailing list to review since one can get much better feedback if someone who is interested in that patch is not added to reviewers on Phabricator. BTW. Actually on Code Review Wiki (https://wiki.freebsd.org/CodeReview) we can see an example of adding mailing list to the subscribers, so you may want to remove that if it is not "kosher". Best regards zbb 2015-07-20 18:33 GMT+02:00 Ian Lepore : > On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 09:08 -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: >> Zbigniew Bodek wrote this message on Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:27 +0200: >> > Just to clarify. You don't want to receive any e-mails from >> > Phabricator on freebsd-arm@ or just those redundant like "(...) >> > created a dependency"? >> >> Mailing lists should never received subscriber added messages.. >> They are a complete waste of traffic... >> >> IMO, the only updates the mailing list should receive are created >> and diff uploaded... >> >> Some could argue that the comments should be too, but IMO, if you care >> about the review, you'll subscribe yourself, and the review has all >> the comments tied together... >> >> Anything else should be not set... and this applies to ALL mailing >> lists... > > I'm not sure ANY review emails should get sent to this list. But if > they are, IMO, it should only be "new review created" emails, nothing > more, ever, even if someone specifically adds the list as a subscriber. > A single "announcement" per review (and likewise for bugs in bugzilla, > which I think we've got right now) allows interested parties to > subscribe themselves. > > -- Ian > >